If the World’s So Flat, Why Are We So Local?

It’s interesting that in this flat world, with the Internet, social media and other digital technologies bringing us together like never before, our strongest relationships often remain the result, to a significant degree, of face-to-face interaction. They’re local.

It’s true. Research shows that our most trusted business relationships are primarily local, with people we can see personally. For example, Community Analytics (disclosure: We have a partnership with them) found that more than 75 percent of decision-makers’ critical business relationships are local.

Now clearly, we’re getting value out of going online for information – product reviews, webinars, even virtual trade shows – and marketing dollars just as clearly need to be intensively focused on these channels for many B2B product categories. But I think there’s also a powerful opportunity to go local, with a strong offline component. It’s actually not really contrarian thinking, but more about being complementary. I believe that online social media works best when accompanied by offline social engagement.

breakfastmtg

Gord Hotchkiss, a search engine marketing expert of all things, hit on two issues in a recent blog post that work better in person – building trust and establishing empathy, which I would suggest are intertwined. Empathy speaks to sharing and understanding another’s emotions, which means we appreciate and connect with each other. We often note that 90 percent of communications is non-verbal – things like facial expressions, gestures, and tone of voice. Emoticons notwithstanding, establishing empathy is simply a more straightforward process face-to-face, at least until some sort of post-Singularity, high-def virtual reality world. And I would argue that empathy is a requirement for trust – an understanding that you can count on me, and I can count on you, for advice, for getting the job done, for delivering on promises.

The reason why we’re racing online with our programs is to find efficiency. I can reach so many more people online who might be relevant to what I have to say – or sell – so much more frequently. And I can also deliver more kinds of information more easily. Online is great for discovering people and it’s great for maintaining relationships. We have to do this and do it creatively.

But I would suggest taking a hard look at face-to-face channels for cementing key relationships. It shouldn’t be hard to cost-justify, considering that the net present value of a lifetime of expensive sales to a business customer can easily reach hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars. So bring that customer advisory board together offline once or twice a year and continue conversations with the board online. Let’s help them strengthen those ties with peers. And hold those regional conferences or seminars, but then be deliberate about using Twitter and other social utilities so in-person attendees are encouraged to share with those who can’t be present, and to encourage conversations to continue after the formal conference ends.

In contrast, big faceless trade shows and mega conferences are the endangered channels, at least in their current form. If in-person gatherings don’t foster one-on-one relationship-building and conversations (and I can imagine how larger events can be reshaped to do that), then they deliver no trust-building and no efficiency and they must go. But I think we’re going to be shaking hands with peers and colleagues for some time.

The first step? Start listening.

427814801_28073d1f0d_mSo many organizations freeze up when the words “social media” are uttered. And the numbers are most likely even higher in the B2B world where many continue to think social platforms don’t impact their organization.

Whatever the case for not engaging on social networks, all organizations can take one step that won’t cost them a dime: Start listening.

In fact, according to many counselors and agencies, listening is the de facto first step organizations should take before engaging in the social space. While there are plenty of impressive tools that will cost you a few bucks each month (take a look at Radian6 if you haven’t already), there are also plenty of free tools (take a look at this expansive list produced by B2B Voice’s own Ken Burbary). That’s right, FREE. 

So, your organization won’t engage? Can’t convince management to take the plunge? Having trouble making a case? No worries–start by listening. Take an hour this week and do the following:

* Set up a number of Google Alerts for your brand, products/services and your competitors. 

* Conduct a simple Twitter Search each day for our brand and the issues that impact your organization. This will give you a sense for what folks are saying about your brand and what they’re thinking about in terms of the issues that impact your company.

* Search the blogosphere for bloggers (use Technorati or Alltop for starters) that write about your brand or your industry. This will help give you a sense for the issues impacting your customers and what the influencers are saying about your brand.

Listen for at least one month. Take copious notes. And use that data and information to build the case (or not) for using social tools. You might be surprised in what you learn in one month.

Bad Behavior has blocked 776 access attempts in the last 7 days.